patching...
Breaking: Police Make Arrest in Public Masturbation Investigation »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

250 Jobs Coming to Horsham Air Guard Station

Officials announced that a drone command center will take flight in Horsham as of Oct. 1.

 

The flying mission of the 111th Fighter Wing may have been grounded, but officials said a new mission is in sight at the Horsham Air Guard Station.

The U.S. Air Force has chosen the Pennsylvania Air National Guard's 111th Fighter Wing, located at the 238-acre Horsham Air Guard Station, adjacent to the shuttered Willow Grove air base, to take on a new Remotely Piloted Aircraft mission.

The National Guard Bureau has authorized the wing to establish a ground-control station for the MQ-9 Reaper at the Horsham Air Guard Station effective Oct. 1.

"This is an exciting time for our wing, and our Airmen are energized to embrace this new mission," Col. Howard "Chip" Eissler, 111th Fighter Wing commander said in a press release issued Tuesday. "I'm proud to see that the Air Force recognizes our wing's capabilities, strategic location and our diversely talented members. The composition, operational tempo and infrastructure of our unit will increase as we prepare to take on this new challenge of housing a high-tech ground control station right here in Horsham."

Nearly 250 jobs, approximately 75 of which are full-time positions, will be added to the wing to support this new mission.

For more news and updates about this story and other Hatboro and Horsham news, subscribe to our free newsletter ,"like" us on Facebook  or follow @Hatboropatch on  Twitter .

The MQ-9 Reaper will be controlled from a virtual cockpit on the installation by a two-person team consisting of a pilot and a sensor operator. The actual aircraft will not be located on the base.

"Airmen on the ground here will soon be behind the controls of a remotely piloted aircraft being flown in locations far from home," said Eissler. "While the MQ-9 will be a significant platform change from the A-10 Thunderbolt II that we flew for years, the mission will be nothing new for the pilots of the 111th. We have been overseas multiple times in our A-10s, now we'll be flying overseas missions from Horsham."

Congressman Patrick Meehan (R-7), called the federal government's "new investment" in Horsham "welcome news."

“The new battlefields of the 21st century are being fought increasingly through the use of drones and other cutting-edge cyberwarfare technologies," Meehan said in a statement. "Our region will soon be at the forefront of this effort. As Chairman of the Subcommittee on Cybersecurity on the Homeland Security Committee, I’ve seen up close how important these efforts are to the war on terror. I have great confidence that the men and women of the Pennsylvania Air Guard are up to the job and will defend our country with great skill and professionalism.”

The 111th Fighter Wing has been in its current location in Horsham since 1963. The highly decorated unit has supported numerous overseas operations since 1995 to include operations Southern Watch, Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom.

News of the Remotely Piloted Aircraft, or drone command center is nothing new. In March 2012, during a visit to the Horsham Air Guard Station, 111th Fighter Wing Commander Col. Howard “Chip” Eissler told Patch that he was awaiting word of a new “flight” mission of sorts. 

The idea, Eissler had said, was to be able to sit in Horsham and use technology to fly planes elsewhere. 

“They take these airplanes, they take them overseas,” Eissler had said. “We actually sit here on the base … We won’t see or touch the airplanes. We will execute a mission in Afghanistan while sitting remotely.”

With the mission in sight, officials said the next step is to hire people to fill the roles. Pennsylvania Air National Guard recruiting superintendent, Senior Master Sgt. Matt Giacobbe, said a robust recruiting effort is required to put people in these cutting-edge positions.

"The Pennsylvania Air National Guard recruits individuals with a diverse set of skills and offers tangible benefits for their service, especially in their pursuit of their higher education," Giacobbe said. "We're specifically seeking current or former military aviators, but are looking forward to recruiting and training a variety of individuals to fill positions related to this new mission inHorsham."

Individuals interested in learning more about these and other positions can call 1-800-997-2264 or visit www.goang.com.

Related Topics: Horsham Air Guard Station, Hyperlocal Hatboro-Horsham Patch, NASJRB Willow Grove, Remotely Piloted Aircraft, and drone center

Mike Shortall

9:53 am on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Like the possibility of 200 new jobs!

Just recommend everyone in the Horsham area keep those bedroom and bathroom curtains drawn! Because they'll have to train and practice SOMETHING!

Reply

Andrew Starr

11:01 am on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

The use of drones world wide and now hear in the states sickens many of us. But to find that a command center is located in my back yard is appalling at best. The days of the base being used to provide defense have been replaced with drones which are nothing more than the weapon of choice for an empire bent on destabilizing the world. It saddens me that not only does Horsham have the dubious distinction of having a drone command center in their back yard but that someday this command center will control drones used against us ……

Reply

Joe Coffee

11:25 am on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

I am excited about the idea of a high tech cutting edge technology such as a drone wing coming to the air base. I live in Horsham and had always enjoyed watching the planes fly around.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Leigh

1:39 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Yep, because nothing else matters.

mac

1:25 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

I think it is great that we will have the cutting edge technologist locally. If you all read correctly the drones won't be here just the controllers. Perhaps Mike you should look for the positive instead of the negative all the time. 250 jobs might not seem like a lot but to local stores and restaurants it is a plus. And I think I would rather know if as you say enemy drones were upon us then to be in the dark about it. Might not be keen on the weaponry, this kind or any. But if it helps detect and deflect those who want to harm our nation then it is a good thing.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Andrew Starr

3:05 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Drones were initially promised to be used only in war zones. They have succeeded in killing numerous civilians in far away countries under the cloak of war. This same cloak is also used by the administration to defend the killing of American citizens with a drone eviscerating our constitutionally protected right to trial. Our administration has subsequently mudded the water with what powers it has to murder Americans on American soil prompting the filibuster by Rand Paul to force an answer from them. (As if this should really be a question!) The FAA has claimed there will be 30,000 drones with the ability to spy on you and shoot at you, in the skys of America by 2020.

It doesn’t take much to see that we are being played the fool and that the use of drones will vastly reduce our freedom…..for jobs? Dumb….

Comment_arrow

pat polichetti

3:40 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Well said, Mac. Obviously, most people can't READ the part about the controllers being there. And I can't believe the ridiculous PARANOIA of some of these people. Amazing. I'm glad to see it, and I'm sure the local business will be glad, maybe even adding a few more JOBS to the area. Is that ok with you, Horsham paranoids? Ha!

Comment_arrow

Mike Shortall

8:41 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Andrew, you have a lot more to worry about Joe Shmoe, living next door, who decides to go out and buy a personal-sized drone to check out what you're doing on the other side of the fence.

All the drones controlled out of the Horsham base will be flying overseas.

Comment_arrow

StGabes

5:39 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

Mike how do you know? Is that what the government said " We will NOT use the Drones against you" Why are they stock piling 1.6billion rounds of ammo and added another 2700 fully armored tanks with gun ports? Why Mike? The ammo they now have can wage a 22year full scale war!!!!! Why Mike? Don't say it's for training, because that much ammo will last them 106 years, plus most calibers they purchased you would not train with... So please explain to me? Paranoid NO Real YES!!!

Comment_arrow

Mike Shortall

5:59 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

Sorry, StGabes ... The DoD SAID the drones controlled out of Horsham would only be flying overseas. If we ever see drones over here, monitoring or spying on civilians, that would obviously be an issue.

For the time being, I'm willing to believe the DoD. But I will be glancing over my shoulder any time I'm doing something illegal or otherwise considered unacceptable.

Andrew Starr

5:21 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Wasn’t it Albert Einstein that said, to paraphrase: paranoia is a higher state of awareness. You calling me paranoid is nothing more than the standard liberal response and means nothing. Instead, I submit that if you looked at the facts I presented, and they are facts, you should have at least some concern. It was Supreme Court Justice David Souter that stated there is nothing worse for our country than the “pervasive civil ignorance of our government” that has this country at risk. I’m afraid after reading your comment, that I agree.

Reply
Comment_arrow

drummers way

6:50 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Andrew. Crawl back in your fallout shelter. Preppers like yourself are very dangerous. I believe it was the Kinks that said: paranoia, they destroy ya'. Anything that overall helps protect this country and bring jobs locally is a good thing. Can’t help but think if the current drone program was from the republicans you’d be a huge fan. Suck it!

Andrea Myers

6:14 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Focusing simply on 250 jobs being added - it's very good news. If you follow the website link you can actually click on the Willow Grove ARS and see the jobs which they are looking to fill. Jobs which also come with the added benefit of (in PA) 100% tuition assistance and VA home loans. That leaves a lot of potential for incoming residents who have the support to make long-term investments in the surrounding community. Local businesses should see some positive effects (and no, not just 'Double Visions').

Reply

Curmudgeon

8:16 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

All you people, just DRONE on!!!

Reply

dman

8:19 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

People like Andrew scare me a lot more than the fact that our military is increasing the use of unmanned aircraft.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tim Lewis

12:24 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Actually, dman, people like you are the scariest of all. Blind trust in a beneficent government, no thought to consequences, the inability to even acknowledge that there might be an issue, let alone keep watch over it.

Andrew Starr

8:44 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

I certainly don’t want to debate you drummers way, there is obviously no chance I could win. I mean, I quote Einstein and you the Kinks. Is there any other class you’d like to put me in? Gay, tall, overweight? Name calling is nothing more than a distraction and a sign of defeat. I merely provided the facts and I’m sorry you don’t have the where withal to investigate yourself. For what it’s worth George W. Bush, the Republican president that started most of this fine mess with the Patriot Act and the Iraqi war, is just as guilty as the Democratic president we have today. If one looks back at the time of the previously mentioned instances one can see how our individual liberties have eroded culminating in the invasive use of drones today. To paraphrase Benjamin Franklin: those that trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both.

Reply
Comment_arrow

drummers way

9:11 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Thank you for bestowing your intellectual mercy upon my meager existence. I see your Ben Franklin and raise you one Col. Jessup (A few Good Men, 1992) “I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that I provide, and then questions the manner in which I provide it! I would rather you just said "Thank you," and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon, and stand a post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you are entitled to!”
One more:
"Those who have served do not question"-drummersway

brian

10:00 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

There's really no difference between a helicopter and a drone, other than the size.

i hate the idea that drones will easily have the ability to watch people without their knowledge. but... restrictions on humans will never last, so we might as well welcome this new technology. when drones are caught spying on people, there will be a technology to counter them. accept change, it is inevitable. resistance is futile.

Reply

Andrew Starr

10:27 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Really drummers way....a quote from a movie. Can't you do better than that? There are so many quotes from those that risked their lives and fortunes to provide you with a free country that they've filled a volume of books. But it is the TV generation that sits not knowing the difference between right and privilege, hoping that if they pledge their allegiance that big brother will watch over them from cradle to grave. I guess your quote is only fitting....

So drummers way, are you saying that you've served? Have you taken the oath? If so I am disappointed. To mock the very liberty you have sworn to protect and defend....with your life. Shame...

Funny, it was the British that told the colonist that resistance was futile.....

A real quote from a real person/patriot....
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We? ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams

Reply
Comment_arrow

J.R. sr

10:11 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

"The problem with quotes on the Internet is that it is difficult to verify authenticity."-Abraham Lincoln

jxjipper

10:28 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

It's amazing how much potential personal liberty people are willing to give up because some mouthpiece who will be gone n 5 years tells us "everything will be OK don't worry". Yeh, don't worry that when this administration bankrupts the country and we used to have was freedom and liberty, it will be gone. The price? Maybe 75 full-time jobs and some additional traffic to the local WAWA.

Reply

Cindy Ragusa

10:40 pm on Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Thank you Andrew! The idea of a drone command center being so close to home is sickening.
I hope that people will do a little research, here's a start...
http://droneswatch.org/2013/01/20/list-of-children-killed-by-drone-strikes-in-pakistan-and-yemen/

Reply

Durable

12:39 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

can we have a drone center at the old prison in Norristown? We need 200 jobs here!

Reply

Adam Young

3:14 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Hmmm.....I'm just recalling all of the human drones who whooped, hollered, and cheered when "The Patriot Act" was passed, taking away a lot of our rights to due process and privacy.

You wanted it, you got it! (Hahahahahahahahahaha!!!)

Reply

Yikes!

6:32 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

http://droneswatch.org/
Stay informed peeps. It is now our issue.

Reply

BrianT

9:00 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

OMG! This is good news,don't we have spy satellites and lasers?We should always keep our bedroom and bathroom curtains drawn when privacy is needed!
We would not want Mumm-RA watching us make stool.

Reply

tedtaylor

9:40 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

I've never read such silliness in my life. The NIMBY's, who cost us a ready-made commercial airport - and who likely moved here long after the air base and then complained about the planes - are now upset because of drones (which are a continent or more away) will be piloted from Horsham. I'm glad to see at least a part of the base doing something other than growing weeds and hosting deteriorating buildings.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Shortall

9:33 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

The facts are these ...
1. Not everyone who opposed the airport are opposed to this job-creating usage. I am an example.

2. Most of us realize the property upon which this activity will be based was never part of the BRAC-affected, to be disposed property.

3. Few people, who complained about "planes", were complaining about the MILITARY usage, only the potential for much higher level of COMMERCIAL use.

4. Even if Horsham had welcomed the concept of an airport with open arms, the property would STILL be "growing weeds and hosting deteriorating buildings" - and probably will be for at least another year - until such time as the Navy completes its impact and disposal processes.

John

9:45 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Andrew kicked your butt drummersway. Are you waching Top Gun now for more quotes?

Reply

Smedley

9:54 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

This is appalling. The use of drones to kill people around the world at the push of a button is a crime against humanity. The idea that you think you have the right to kill men women and children with no hearing or trial is simply wrong. Even the nazi war criminals got a trial at Nuremberg. Thousands of innocent people have been killed by us with these drones. In fact the first people to be killed by a drone was in the middle east. Three junk men looking for scrap metal were observed by a drone operator. One of them had a large black beard. Not unusual for the middle east. The drone operator fired a missle and killed them in the remote possibility it could be osama bin laden. It wasn't. Murder in the first degree.
Now they are planning to give out medals for killing people with drones that has higher honor than the purple heart ! Unbelievable. Why is a life in another country not worth as much as a life in this country? There is a good reason why we're hated around the world. This is one of them. WE HAVE BECOME THE GRIM REAPER FOR MONEY AND GREED !!! GOD HELP US !!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

James Kephart Jr.

10:58 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Always depends on the life you are specifically talking about. I would argue that I could make a generalization and answer that question like this : because the people we are targeting are aholes stuck back in the dark ages and need to be eliminated from this planet - usually.

That being said, I am about ready to say we should pull our troops from every place on this planet unless the host country wants us there and is willing to pay us 2X our costs to keep us there.

Let someone else try and police the world for a while - I heard China has some extra cash!

Follow that advice and we may be able to get 3X cost...

Comment_arrow

Mike Shortall

8:48 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

What exactly is the difference between a cruise missile that in effect accomplishes the same thing - killing innocent people in the wrong place at the wrong time - and drone that does the same thing? I would suggest that at least the drone gives the operator the chance to avoid collateral casualties.

Perfect? No ... Better? Yes

Michael J.

10:41 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

One more drone in the air, one less pilot's life in danger.

Reply

Leigh

11:25 am on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

James, your view is really disturbing. The people that you label as "stuck in the dark ages" view us as the ones to be eliminated from this planet. The truth is that everywhere in this world are zealots, but most people simply want to live their lives and protect their families. Regardless of whether or not you support what Horsham is doing, and I really can understand both sides, your complete lack of basic empathy is pathetic.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tim Lewis

12:29 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Sorry Leigh - "most people" are not the ones being targeted right now - it is the ones who live their lives solely for the destruction of America who are. No empathy for them.

Tony

12:33 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

I would like to thank all of you for making my day more entertaining by going back and forth with the same old left and right rhetoric over and over. It makes for excellent reading.

Reply

Erica Anton

1:27 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

are their going to be jobs for civilians? or just Air national guard members?

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Theresa Katalinas

1:53 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Erica,
The link at the end of the story takes you to the page with all of the available jobs Looks like some could be for civilians, although most seem to require a medical/technical/bio background.

andthatsthetruth

4:28 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Why don't you call the phone number printed there & ask the experts.

Reply

drummers way

4:50 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Amazing how misinformed the public is. What makes you think a drone makes it easier to violate or harm a person? Unfortunately throughout my career I’ve seen man’s inhumanity toward man too often. War is a nasty business with or without this technology. Is there a possibility for misuse, of course there is. But no more then other mainstream forms of intelligence gathering and combat. You will never take the killing of innocent out of war. I tried to make light of those narrow mind folks that think they appear smart by quoting intelligent men. Truth is there is an app for that too. You have the right to your opinion and the right to complain. Just remember how that right has been achieved and protected.

Reply

John

5:18 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Hey drummers way "you can't handle the truth"

Reply

John

5:26 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Has anyone realized that the government is putting a milatary target in a populated area. Why would they do that? Then they make it public and the patch even marked it on a map. If the bad guys want to stop the Drones they bomb Horsham thats great.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Shortall

8:50 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Well, it's not like they couldn't locate an 892 acre military base for over the last 70 years.

Comment_arrow

Yikes!

8:31 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

John has a good point....Horsham could now be considered a target. If we keep taking out kids and civilians over there, things could get interesting around here.
Looks like it is finally being taken seriously in Washington DC. 30,000 drones over US skies in 20 years? Morons....
http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/03/20/17389193-lawmakers-voice-concerns-on-drone-privacy-questions?lite

John

9:54 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Well Mike an air base has ways to defend the facuilty like planes. The drone center is one building close to a school and 892 acres that is going to be developed soon. People protested having an airport of any kind that would have created more jobs than 250 but they let them drop this in there. 250 jobs are not going to make that much of a differance to Horsham or Montgomery County.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Leigh

7:15 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Your point is valid John, but what I don't get is when was this being discussed? Residents made sure that an airport was not an option, but I don't believe we had a voice in this matter. Done undercover.

Comment_arrow

Mike Shortall

9:50 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Leigh:
The property controlled now by the Pennsylvania ANG was never part of the to-be-disposed BRAC property. It remained in Federal control, and they had no requirement to seek local approval any more than they did when they ran the entire base.

John:
For at least 40 years the threat to a facility like NAS Willow Grove was a nuclear strike. There weren't enough planes anywhere to prevent or protect the base or the locals in that event. So how is this any different from any other military installation located in any other suburban environment where schools and homes and businesses are in close proximity?

Your theory on job creation as an airport is a long-on-odds dream under the only airport proposal that was presented, which claimed at least that the airport would remain a small-time, muni/pleasure facility. The only way it would have created even 250 jobs was if it was developed into a much busier, much bigger commercial facility, which is exactly what the People of Horsham didn't want.

Julian

10:06 pm on Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Nothing is more cowardly than being a drone operator, killing people across the world as if it were a video game.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Peter gozinya

2:50 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Oh really? If you had the choice of going to Afghanistan to fight hand to hand, or just stay in Horsham, which would you choose? If you choose Afghanistan, you sure are a chump!

Patch_comments_icon

Theresa Katalinas

7:20 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Leigh,
If I can clarify ... this land is NOT the portion of the air base that is currently in play for redevelopment. The entire parcel is 1,100 acres, of which 862 are to be redeveloped. This 238-acre parcel - the Horsham Air Guard Station - is adjacent to the former base, but is not part of it. It was and still remains in federal hands. Local officials and residents do not have a say in what the federal government can do with its property.

Reply

Rick350

8:17 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

This is about the silliest argument I've seen. OMG, not a weapons facility? In our backyard? But wait, when the base was open, we had 'instruments of war' for decades. A10 Warthogs with real live bombs that were used in war. Manned by pilots who could die. Really, a 'cowardly drone operator'? You liberals are a trip.....

Reply

Yikes!

8:41 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

I see this as yet another level on the construction of a whole troubling house of cards. When will the UN stand up to the USA and call us to task on our unethical crimes against humanity aka The Game of Drones? Sorry - I am as patriotic as the next guy, but we are way out of line here...if Russia or another country were sending these things out on a weekly "kill list" mission to another country, we would be horrified.

Reply

Smedley

8:43 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Is this all our country is good for now? Endless wars and occupation for resources. That's right. We're in Afghanistan for resources not freedom and democracy. The same for Libya and Africa. Resources. Aren't you people tired of endless war? The constant flow of our proud military men coming home in body bags. Over 4500 now. Hundreds of thousands wounded. A veteran now has to wait an average of 600 days to get any help from the veterans administration. 20 of our proud soldiers commit suicide every day waiting for help. Now they are pounding the drum for a war in Iran. A country that hasn't attacked another country in over 800 years. Wake up people. The main stream media is Garbage. I ask all you christians out there. What about the ten commandments. Thou shalt not kill. Do you think God makes an exception for you.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Yikes!

9:05 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Amen Smedley, well stated. Run for office, I will vote for you.

Comment_arrow

Mike Shortall

9:56 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Funny how Christians are the only ones ever singled out for not living up to their religion-based values.

Oh wait, I forgot ... There are religions that ARE actually living their religious values when they maim and kill.

Comment_arrow

Yikes!

10:50 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Mike - that is probably because many "Christ"ians are those who quote Jesus Christ as their lord and master, the man recorded as a sympathetic Pacifist who could even be called Liberal and Leftist in his views. Many "Christians" are largely the opposite of that with their intolerant views and self-righteous lack of sympathy for others as fellow "Children of God". The Drone program is all about violating the same basic human values of respect for life, by deeming others as harmful and deserving of death without the decency of a chance to defend themselves.

andthatsthetruth

8:47 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

I agree Rick. When the stealth was here, everyone was excited to try to see it. They have always kept safety in mind for the Horsham Community. I don't see that happening now.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Shortall

9:59 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

You will have to explain how this facility makes it any less "safe" in Horsham compared to how "safe" it was during the last 70 years, including that period of time known as the Cold War.

Rick350

9:08 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Our crimes against humanity????? Are you freaking kidding me? And Smedley, no one likes war. The problem is, kooks like that idiot in N Korea loves war. The kooks in Iran who want to 'wipe Israel from the face of the earth'. The kook in Syria who has killed thousands of his own people. The list goes on and on. The world is very unstable. I am a Vietnam Vet and all to well knows the horrors of war. They will never go away. War has been a part of the human race for centuries. Hey I know, maybe we can send Dennis Rodman to visit all these unstable countries and friend them! But Yikes is way out of line. The UN?????? That corrupt and worthless organization? Our crimes against humanity? To use a couple modern pharses, OMG, WTF is wrong with you?

Reply

John

10:32 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Mike your first post at the top of this page you were mocking this facility now you are defending it. I am not saying we are more or less safe that was not my point. I just want to know if it is worth the risk for 250 jobs. Why not just put it somewhere else like a large base that is still operational that has the abiltiy to defend its self just in case. The world has changed over the last 40 years and so has warfare. I would guess that WGNAS would not be a high priority target back in the day like a drone center would be today. Your nuclear comment is true but if there was a strike anywhere in the world back then it would have affected a lot more than Horsham and Willow Grove. As for the jobs when the base was open there were a lot more than 250 and I did not notice a huge drop in the traffic congestion when it closed. Having an airport of some kind would have a huge impact on the local economy not just in Horsham. I am sure the government could put 250 jobs in there doing something else like pushing papers or training dogs.A drone command center does not make sense to me. Keep them curtains closed tight. Right Mike

Reply
Comment_arrow

mac

11:12 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Are you all really reading your comments? People there are bases in just about every state in the union. And at least 20 or more overseas. Where do you travel and vacation Virginia Beach, home to one of the largest, Florida, again another large base area. And just because they are partially closed does not mean they are not targets. Yet remember the countries overseas Europe, Asia etc also have their own bases and are targets Do you travel there? So no matter where you go it just depends on who you are an ally with or an enemy with. And how many of you go to bed at night feeling safe because you do live near a base? You knew it was here when you moved to Horsham. If you want a better understanding of the drones go to you tube and actually watch all of the videos put out by the air guard explaining their purpose and missions. Yes there is human error there is that in people who drive cars and take lives too! As well as those who shoot into crowds. But perhaps these drones have a purpose to keep more of our young soldiers away from harm. The youtube search is MQ-9 reaper.

Comment_arrow

Mike Shortall

1:21 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

John: Give me a break. My initial comment was humor poked at drones not the base.

Got news for you too. The region has numerous DOD sites that ALL have the potential for being targets if the twisted nutjobs in their fits of "non-Christian religious fervor" ever wanted to make another political statement at the cost of innocent civilians. Many of those sites also have schools and homes nearby.

When you speak of an airport with huge economic impact, you are speaking of exactly the type of commercial operation Horsham residents didn't want. And thankfully, that boat has already sailed! If "the region" thinks they need another airport (They don't.), they can always expand Doylestown or Wings or someone else's backyard. I'm just estatic that our Township leaders recognized the potential and were the only local/regional entity to willingly take on the BRAC/LRA responsibility!

BTW ... The Government (i.e. Rendell's initiative) tried to put a lot more than 250 "paper pushing" jobs at the JRBWG base; but it fell apart due to lack of interest and funding.

Thomas Jefferson

11:00 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

So, accidentally vaporizing someone's house with a drone strike because they thought it was a terrorist hideout is just collateral damage, eh Rick? You should tell that to the families who have lost loved ones because "war is part of the human race". There are estimates that there are 50 civilians killed for every 1 terrorist through the use of drone strikes. But it's not happening to you or your family, so who cares, right Rick? That's just the cost of our freedom, delivered down the barrel of a gun.

Yes, it is a crime against humanity when we commit extra judicial murder. And this should not be in our backyard, plain and simple.

Reply

Rick350

11:21 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

I have no idea what you are talking about. I simply stated that wars have been fought for centuries. I am not minimizing war. As stated I am a Vietnam vet. I know all about the horrors of war. Stop blaming America as some evil empire. The world is full of evil countries. I named some.

Reply

Thomas Jefferson

11:44 am on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Just because other countries have committed war crimes doesn't excuse us from doing so. You're perspective is that there are other countries which are worse, and by comparison we are nothing like them. However, as I pointed out, we've already accidentally vaporized families, which is a war crime, and is not excused because it's "not as bad" as other country's action. That is faulty, ridiculous logic.

Reply

Chris Gowen

12:07 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

I can't believe there are posts here discussing the validity of using unmanned aircraft to eliminate 'dangerous" people in isolated areas. The front page of this Patch has a picture of John Kulick..a man who died in Iraq because the U.S. did not have this technology. Imagine if there were drones 10 years ago and the military targets would have been terrorist camps and training grounds. the towers would still exist, fewer soldiers losing lives, fewer innocent people--even in Iraq and Afghan, would not be dead. For those of you arguing that the people being targeted are not tried and are "murdered", I believe they have already "tried" every American citizen and even some of their own (didn't a huge bombing occur in Iraq earlier this week that killed many civilians) and found us guilty and ought to die. Not in my backyard----then MOVE!!!

Oh yeah, for those "new" to the area...the base has been a major target concern for iver 50 years since it monitored the airways and waterways across the Atlantic with radar surveillance and as an AWACs base. It was a submarine monitoring base during WWII. It has always been SAFE in our backyard---thanks to our wonderful military and intelligence community for keeping us in Hatboro, Horsham, and Willow Grove safe from insurgence and attacks!!! Wonder how many incidents they actually thwarted using traditional war techniques.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Blind Dog

12:41 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

After reading some of these idiotic paranoia filled comments I've lost even more faith in our society. Clowns to the left of me...jokers to the right.....here I am, stuck in the middle with Chris. Just go hide in your bunkers with your canned goods while the rest of us are eradicated.

Peter gozinya

1:16 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Wow, you guys are scaring me. Did you do any research on drones? Or are you just spouting your opinion without any real knowledge of the subject? Are you just scared of them because you were disturbed by the Terminator movies? Do a little research - DRONES SAVE LIVES! And before you come back at me, who's side are you on? Because you really should pick a side. I am on the U.S. side. I live in the U.S. ! I stand behind our armed services. I will not sit here and bitch about things i know nothing about. The drones pick a distinct target. Think about it. Our buddies in Afghanistan and Iran and Iraq don't care about collateral damage. Car bombs, IEDs, people bombs, blow up whomever happens to be within range. At least we are trying to pinpoint our targets. And as for remote piloting, you can make much, much better decisions when you don't have bullets or missiles coming at you. If I was getting shot at, I would probably shoot at anything that moved until the bullets stopped. Remote pilots can keep their cool, and take out only the target. And who said these drones in question will be equipped with explosives? Maybe they are only reconnaissance drones.. DO SOME RESEARCH, then come back and comment!

Reply
Comment_arrow

StGabes

6:02 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

read the first couple sentences of the first link... Great Post!

Peter gozinya

2:15 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Ok, one of those is a real news source.. But it is a start.
If your son or daughter was eligible for the draft, would you rather they go over there and engage in hand to hand combat? Or pilot a drone from Horsham? I do not want my son or daughter meeting a violent death in the middle east, but if we don't try to stop terrorism, it will end up right here in Horsham eventually. Then you will wish for a drone to help you!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Nicholas C Hillman

5:39 pm on Monday, March 25, 2013

I am ok with drones during declared war, but use outside of that bothers me.
This article list some.

http://warminster.patch.com/blog_posts/the-willow-grove-air-base-must-not-have-a-drone-command-center

Thomas Jefferson

2:37 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

I see, so you get to decide what is legitimate or not, how convenient. So what is legitimate, the The Telegraph or The Guardian (two of UK's oldest and most respected new agencies), Human Rights Watch, CNN or Salon? Every one of those sources is completely credible and vetted, you sound like a fool.

If we don't stop terrorism it will wind up on our door step? That kind of weak logic is an excuse for tyranny that any true American would soundly reject. The path to ending terrorism is stop our jingoist foreign policy and short sighted thinking that leads us to invade Iraq, a country that never attack us and posed zero threat to this country's security.

Wake up and try thinking for yourself instead of vomiting up the same fear mongering scare tactics that get repeated ad nauseum. If you are worried about terror on your doorstep, maybe you should be worried about a program that is used to murder civilians without trial being setup right in your backyard.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Peter gozinya

2:52 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

I bet you think 911 was an inside job, too.

Comment_arrow

Thomas Jefferson

3:11 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Actually I don't think that at all, the reason we were attack was clearly state by Bin Laden, mainly because of our invasion of Iraq and giving billions of dollars and weapons to Israel. Which by the way is illegal since it countermands a law concerning providing money to countries with undeclared nuclear programs, which it is well known Israel has. But who cares about law right?

Also, you pretty much made my point for me, because it is our foreign policy decisions that lead to the attack. In no way does that justify it, but it's pretty clear that our awful foreign policy choices have consequences. When we invade countries without provocation or sell rockets that are used to murder civilians, we are making moral choices that affect people. Of course, instead of discussing these issues, people rant about how terrorists "hate our freedom", or other such dismissive phrases like the one you used, in order to ignore the debate and facts.

You want research? I've done plenty, you've clearly done none.

Peter gozinya

3:15 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Tommy, by the way, I am not arguing about the ideology of war here, that is another subject. I am just discussing drones. Iraq is and will always be a huge disgrace as far as I am concerned.

Reply

John

5:35 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Just for the record I am all for drone and other unmanned wepons. Mike you are right the airport ship has sailed. I was just questioning the wisdom of our leaders in Washington and we all know they are geniuses why put a "potential milatary target" in a very densely populated area.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Shortall

5:46 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

I don't have a problem with them putting it here so much as I have a problem with them making it public knowledge.

Comment_arrow

StGabes

6:09 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

Those people in Washington are far from geniuses....

Jason G

6:55 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

I am just hoping for a drone air show..

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Shortall

10:25 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013

I always LOVED the air shows. Not the traffic from them so much ...

John

10:42 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Jason that is a great idea they can have it at Hatters stadium and instead of the Blue Angels they be the Blue Cherubs.

Reply

Smedley

10:59 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

Rick350 you have no idea what is going on around the world. Kooks in North Korea? Kooks in Iran? Kooks in Syria? Are you there now? Have you talked to anyone that lives there? Based on what you say you don't really have any idea what's going on in those countries. What you are saying is repeating the garbage you heard in the main stream media. The quote by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad about wiping Israel off the map is a total lie. Do you know what he really said? At the time he said, Quote - "This regime which is occupying Jerusalem shall vanish from the pages of time". The piece of crap called the New York Times changed it to "Israel should be wiped off the map" and the main stream media has been repeating it ever since. It's a lie. He never said that. Are you capable of independent thought or do you only believe and repeat everything you hear in the main stream media.

Reply

Smedley

11:03 pm on Thursday, March 21, 2013

I have friends that served in Viet Nam. They don't believe what the government and main stream media says.

Reply

Ann Knipfer

4:25 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013

POLICE STATE. Sell your freedom for a job...

Reply

Gregory Marston

8:35 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013

This is a good thing for Horsham, with a smaller Pheonix rising out of the ashes of the once vibrant base. But it sounds like you can't please the people of Horsham no matter what you do. Horsham is probably the only town in America to REJECT the massive job-creating machine that was the runway. I mean people in Horsham are so hood-winked that they were happy that 5,000 jobs just walked out and moved over to New Jersey. Also the couple hundred million dollars in construction that went with it. Now the township will spend tens of millions to demolish all the buildings AND assuming that there are no toxic spills anywhere on the base (I mean I'm sure NOTHING was spilled over the last 78 years there) - then there will be more room for Low Income Housing. I think it is wonderful that the people of Horsham are going to allow a major expansion of the sewage plant and bringing in hundred of low income families. I see no reason that having thousands of new children in Horsham would effect the tax base there. Isn't the Federal Government going to help Horsham build the new schools for these new Horsham residents? So a new sewage plant and new low income housing will make Horsham just a great little town to buy a new home and pay property taxes into the new schools that will have to be built. LOL. Be careful what you wish for. I'm sure that Toll Brothers can't wait to build new houses downwind from the new sewage plant........

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Shortall

10:21 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013

Where to start debunking much of this BS ...?

First off, COL Marston has been a steadfast supporter of an airport and maintaining the runway at the JRBWG site. So one has to keep that in mind when deciphering the intent behind his misleading remarks.

1. Not everyone in Horsham, not even everyone in Horsham who were against keeping the runway open and operating a muni airport there, are opposed to this new military initiative.

2. His statement of that an airport would be a "massive job-creatng machine" is pure pie-in-the-sky, because no private muni-type airport operation was going to create a massive number of jobs. That would only have resulted from an all service, full hours (24 hours a day, 7 days a week) commercial airport with both passenger and freight operations.

3. No one in Horsham had any control whatsoever that 5000 jobs were moved to New Jersey. That was a federal BRAC decision, that few - if any - people in Horsham were glad to see happen. Not sure who was supposedly doing the hood-winking, but Greg's doing quite a bit of it here.

Comment_arrow

Mike Shortall

10:22 pm on Saturday, March 23, 2013

4. The building that need to be demolished would have to be demolished regardless of whether the JRBWG remained an airport or not. The Navy's actions in closing the base over the years since 2005, ensured that.

5. Horsham will pay nothing towards mitigation of any of the ground contamination on the base property. That remains the Navy's responsibility to fix before they can turn the property over to anyone ... even if it remained an airport.

6. There will be very little "low income housing" and that which will be there is REQUIRED for set-aside to an properly credentialed and funded non-profit by the same BRAC law. In fact, the subsidized housing is supposed to be prioritized for homeless veterans. Too bad the good Colonel sees this as a NEGATIVE feature of the redevelopment process. I think it a great way for the Horsham community to give back!

7. From little I know about the sewage plant, its presence there is purely to support the remaining military footprint there. It has little if anything to do with the plans to redevelop the property. Unfortunately, Colonel Marston equates the obscenity of a sewage plant to the good-hearted, BRAC-required condition of giving a few - not “hundreds” - of homeless veterans and their families a hand up.



That's just sad.

Comment_arrow

pat polichetti

6:22 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

Well said, Greg. And in addition to the housing, how about an empty office complex just like the one in Fort Washington? Ha.

StGabes

5:57 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

Ok so a lot of you are fine with this, What about our government (DHS - HomeLand Security) stock piling 1.6 billion rounds of ammo all different flavors... That's enough ammo to wage a 22 year war. If they were to train with that it's enough to last 106 years. Now it's time for you people to really use your heads, ask questions? Are they expecting an invasion? What do they know we don't? What are they not telling us? Why the need for so much ammo? And the weather service department purchased like 25 million rounds or so WHY? http://godfatherpolitics.com/9856/warning-signs-obama-poised-hostile-military-takeover-us/

Reply
Comment_arrow

StGabes

5:59 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

oh yeah I forgot to mention the 2700 armored vehicles they purchased as well with gun ports....

StGabes

6:12 pm on Sunday, March 24, 2013

Look people!!!! I know I miss and loved the air base that it was, but it will NEVER be the old base again.... It's gone!! Now Tyranny has moved in!! SORRY!!!!

Reply

pat polichetti

10:50 am on Monday, March 25, 2013

You can cut the paranoia around Horsham with a knife. Ha!

Reply

David Pitcairn

10:53 am on Monday, March 25, 2013

It seems pretty obvious to me that the 111th, as a flying wing, is not really a flying wing without a flying mission. Take away the runway and what is left? Remotely operating drones.

While the Air Force would be first to admit that the current generation of fighter jets would not be able to be stationed in Horsham, there are other pilot in the cockpit flying missions they could have brought to the airport. And still had the ability to fly in relief supplies on airplanes.

Without an airport, drones are the only option I can think of. So, if you don't like the drones and you were fighting to keep the runway closed, you brought this on yourself.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Andrew Starr

1:11 pm on Monday, March 25, 2013

David, you are so wrong and you know it! Do you really think the military would land it's aircraft on your little private airfield. Shame on you for stirring the pot with a completely unrelated issue

Comment_arrow

Mike Shortall

3:24 pm on Monday, March 25, 2013

I can live with it. The drone mission doesn't bother me in the least. I'll take a military flying mission occurring thousands of miles away as opposed to a commercial airport in my backyard.

David Pitcairn

6:51 pm on Monday, March 25, 2013

Sorry Andrew, you are the wrong one. It appears that after all these years you have been fighting the airport, you have learned little about aviation.. I bet you have no problem with Mike "stirring the pot" calling it a "commercial airport", a way to imply that it would be an airliner airport, even though it would not. Your website claimed an airport would have noise and pollution equivalent to the three busiest airports in the nation. Shame on you.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Shortall

8:50 pm on Monday, March 25, 2013

David, no one KNOWS what an airport in Horsham would look like - or sound like - in 10 15 20 years of existence. Fact is, I can't recall a SINGLE AIRPORT that ever stayed the same size or maintained the same level of activity as time went on. Can you?

And as for "stirring the pot", you always seem to have a lot to say about the airbase for a guy living somewhere else not called Horsham! If I remember correctly, you don't even live in Montgomery or Bucks Counties.

David Pitcairn

6:57 pm on Monday, March 25, 2013

I welcome the jobs the drone program is bringing to the region.

Reply

Yikes!

7:44 pm on Monday, March 25, 2013

Again - what about the FAA statement concerning 30,000 drones expected in the skies over America in two years??? Are they serious?
Here is the quote from the NBC Politics article last week (link in my above post):

"Last year, Congress gave the Federal Aviation Administration until 2015 to devise rules to integrate drones into the national airspace system. The agency predicted last year that 30,000 drones will be traveling the skies above America in the next 20 years."
THAT is troubling enough, without the added bonus of Horsham becoming a control base for them.
Does this aspect of the situation not bother anyone here?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mike Shortall

8:55 pm on Monday, March 25, 2013

There is no indication or intention for the Horsham base to be controlling any drones flying within the U.S. Please stop with the pants-on-fire panic mongering.

I imagine much of what the FAA is concerned about are the thousands of personal drones people will be playing with as the technology permits smaller and smaller vehicles of this sort. I doubt there will be 30,000 GOVERNMENT drones flying.

James Derstine

9:51 pm on Monday, March 25, 2013

I saw this interactive about drones used in Pakistan today, I thought it was interesting to see it laid out visually. http://drones.pitchinteractive.com/

Reply

Yikes!

9:58 pm on Monday, March 25, 2013

30,000 personal drones in two years? That may be the conjecture but I'd rather hear that for certain than just imagine it...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Yikes!

7:46 am on Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Sorry - that's 20 years....I guess that means that they will be available on the commercial market, and the FAA has no plans to set limits on their use? So much to consider, Congress had better get to work and get some good laws in place or we will have a real mess on our hands...

Bill

12:06 am on Tuesday, March 26, 2013

Drone Killings of U.S. Citizens
A 50-Point Swing Against
Question: Should the U.S. "use drones to launch airstrikes in other countries against U.S. citizens living abroad who are suspected terrorists?" The new numbers: 41 percent for, 52 percent against.

The lede of the poll is even kinder to Paul, finding as high as 79 percent opposition to targeted killing in the United States. But that's a new question. On the old question, we've seen a real queasy swing of public opinion.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2013/03/25/a_50_point_swing_against_targeted_drone_killings_of_u_s_citizens.html

Reply

Bill

12:20 am on Tuesday, March 26, 2013

DHS To Buy 360,000 More Rounds of Hollow Point Ammunition

While the Department of Homeland Security continues to ignore members of Congress demanding to know why the federal agency is engaged in an apparent arms build-up, the

DHS has just announced it plans to purchase another 360,000 rounds of hollow point ammunition to add to the roughly 2 billion bullets already bought over the past year...

Retired United States Army Captain Terry M. Hestilow sending a letter to Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) warning that the ammo purchases represent “a bold threat of war by that agency (DHS), and the Obama administration, against the citizens of the United States of America.”

http://www.infowars.com/dhs-to-buy-360000-more-rounds-of-hollow-point-ammunition/

Reply

Leave a comment